Solvable Group Representations and Free Divisors Whose Complements Are K(π, 1)‘s
نویسندگان
چکیده
A classical result of Arnold and Brieskorn [Bk], [Bk2] states that the complement of the discriminant of the versal unfolding of a simple hypersurface singularity is a K(π, 1). Deligne [Dg] showed this result could be placed in the general framework by proving that the complement of an arrangement of reflecting hyperplanes for a Coxeter group is again a K(π, 1) (and more generally for simplicial arrangements). A discriminant complement for a simple hypersurface singularity can be obtained as the quotient of the complement of such a hyperplane arrangement by the free action of a finite group, and hence is again is a K(π, 1). What the discriminants and Coxeter hyperplane arrangements have in common is that they are free divisors. This notion was introduced by Saito [Sa], motivated by his discovery that the discriminants for the versal unfoldings of isolated hypersurface singularities are always free divisors. By contrast, Knörrer [Ko] found an isolated complete intersection singularity, for which the complement of the discriminant of the versal unfolding is not a K(π, 1) (although it is again a free divisor by a result of Looijenga [L]). This leads to an intriguing question about when a free divisor has a complement which is a K(π, 1). This remains unsettled for the discriminants of versal unfoldings of isolated hypersurface singularities; this is the classical “K(π, 1)-Problem”. Also, for hyperplane arrangements, there are other families such as arrangements arising from Shephard groups which by Orlik-Solomon [OS] satisfy both properties; however, it remains open whether the conjecture of Saito is true that every free arrangement has complement which is a K(π, 1). A survey of these results on arrangements can be found in the book of Orlik-Terao [OT]. Except for isolated curve singularities in C (and the total space for their equisingular deformations), there are no other known examples of free divisors whose complements are K(π, 1)’s. While neither K(π, 1)-problem has been settled, numerous other classes of free divisors have been discovered so this question continues to arise in new contexts. In this paper, we define a large class of free divisors whose complements are K(π, 1)’s by using the results obtained in [DP1]. These free divisors are “determinantal arrangements”, which are analogous to hyperplane arrangements except that we replace a configuration of hyperplanes by a configuration of determinantal varieties (and the defining equation is a product of determinants rather than a product of linear factors).
منابع مشابه
Solvable Groups, Free Divisors and Nonisolated Matrix Singularities Ii: Vanishing Topology
In this paper we use the results from the first part to compute the vanishing topology for matrix singularities based on certain spaces of matrices. We place the variety of singular matrices in a geometric configuration of free divisors which are the “exceptional orbit varieties”for repesentations of solvable groups. Because there are towers of representations for towers of solvable groups, the...
متن کاملSolvable Groups, Free Divisors and Nonisolated Matrix Singularities I: Towers of Free Divisors
This paper is the first part of a two part paper which introduces a method for determining the vanishing topology of nonisolated matrix singularities. A foundation for this is the introduction in this first part of a method for obtaining new classes of free divisors from representations V of connected solvable linear algebraic groups G. For equidimensional representations where dimG = dimV , wi...
متن کاملOn Strong Multiplicity One for Automorphic Representations
We extend the strong multiplicity one theorem of Jacquet, Piatetski-Shapiro and Shalika. Let π be a unitary, cuspidal, automorphic representation of GLn(AK). Let S be a set of finite places of K, such that the sum ∑ v∈S Nv −2/(n+1) is convergent. Then π is uniquely determined by the collection of the local components {πv | v 6∈ S, v finite} of π. Combining this theorem with base change, it is p...
متن کاملOn the Gruenberg–Kegel graphs of finite groups
Let G be a finite group. The spectrum of G is the set ω(G) of orders of all its elements. The subset of prime elements of ω(G) is called the prime spectrum ofG and is denoted by π(G). The spectrum ω(G) of a groupG defines its Grunberg–Kegel graph (or prime graph) Γ(G) with vertex set π(G), in which any two different vertices r and s are adjacent if and only if the number rs belongs to the set ω...
متن کاملGlobal Rigidity of Solvable Group Actions on S Lizzie Burslem and Amie Wilkinson
In this paper we find all solvable groups that act effectively on the circle as realanalytic diffeomorphisms, and we find all of their actions. Our starting point is the procedure of ramified lifting of group actions with a global fixed point, which we develop in Section 1. To summarize the discussion there, we say that a real analytic map π : S → S is a ramified covering map over p ∈ S if the ...
متن کامل